|
Building
a web of defence
Wednesday, 6 November 2002 - MANY local companies still do
not have proper security infrastructure in place, opening
up doors of opportunities for hackers and intruders to come
into corporate networks as freely as they want to. And when
that happens, the "victims" are usually left with a trail
of destruction like the lost of valuable information, malicious
virus attacks, and worst of all, businesses come to a standstill.
Judging by recent market developments, IT security of late
has become the most pressing concern in the local information
and communications technology (ICT) trade - all bearing testimony
that IT security is akin to a house of cards ready to collapse
anytime.
Increased awareness
According to Beh Swan Swan, chief executive of Secure Tangent
Sdn Bhd, its growing significance is such that the Government
has published MyMIS (Malaysian Public Sector Management Of
Information and Communications Technology Security Handbook),
providing guidelines for security management and practices
for the public sector.
The handbook outlines ways to assess an organisation's vulnerability,
its strength and security policy, as well as security architecture
deployed. From the industry's perspective, the mushrooming
of security solutions vendors ranging from offering public
key infrastructure, biometrics to single sign-ons, signifies
the rampant growth of the industry, says Beh. This trend also
means users may face difficulty understanding what to purchase
for their security needs, she adds.
"IT security has also been given greater emphasis especially
after Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange came up with the corporate
governance guidelines," says Beh. The guidelines require the
board of directors of a public-listed company to analyse,
among others, their business risks and assets, and how they
go about protecting those elements using IT tools.
Meanwhile, Selinna Chin, country manager for Malaysia and
Indonesia, IDC Market Research (M) Sdn Bhd, says the Sept
11 terrorist attacks had raised awareness of IT security throughout
the world.
"Before the attacks, security was viewed as more like just
insurance policies," Chin comments. Security solutions then
were limited to point solutions like firewall, anti-virus,
and implemented on an add-on basis when a company is hit,
she says, adding that the local financial industry has higher
implementation rate compared to other industries.
But after the attacks, the lackadaisical attitude has improved
with more awareness, investments, and implementations taking
place, she notes. Still, compared with other countries like
Korea and Singapore, Malaysia seems to be taking more reactive
measures and learning to understand security risks. "Over
in Europe, companies there have bypassed the era of understanding
threats and risks years ago, and they are now looking at the
complexity of solutions," says Chin. Therefore, vendors need
to further educate and provide the necessary information to
their local clients.
Chin stresses that security should be viewed as a mainstream
boardroom issue, not as a business unit-driven one. "Companies,
especially those going into e-business, need to really look
at security as a total holistic solution, in other words part
of their IT investment. The reason is if security is breached,
companies may lose customers and brand equity".
At the Government level, IT security awareness is unfortunately
lacking, says Chin. "Even before 9/11, they only reacted to
coming out with guidelines when some Government Web sites
got hacked," she says, adding that the Government should have
thought more seriously about security beforehand.
The growth of IT security was also compounded by the rapid
growth of the Internet, says See Beng Keng, senior general
manager, e-banking group, Alliance Bank Malaysia Berhad. "The
transmission control protocol/Internet protocol (TCP/IP) technology
of the Internet has a lot of weaknesses," says See. A lot
of issues like authentication and encryption within that protocol
are not being addressed, thus, people come up with ways to
patch things, he adds.
The tools to do so were then made publicly available, and
that led to an increase in hacking activities, says See. "What
is important now is to convey the message to the less knowledgeable,
give them some fundamental methodologies to help them set
up a proper security infrastructure," he adds.
Security vendors should not be selling the fear and problems
of security to users, but rather educate them on the solutions
to address those problems, See stresses. Bank Negara's guidelines
towards a sound security framework have also boosted the awareness
level of IT security locally. Though not comprehensive enough,
See says it is one of the better security frameworks around,
an organised approach to educate banking and financial institutions
the basic understanding of security issues. Dang Kok Heng,
senior manager, MIS department, Allianz General Insurance
Malaysia Berhad, felt that the Enron case has made IT security
even more crucial among organisations.
"The focus now should be on internal security to avoid espionage,
protecting information assets, in addition to external security,"
he points out. Overall, Dang sees CEOs are increasingly becoming
more aware of IT security, though the mentality still stands
that security is solely an IT department issue. This is inevitable
as most CEOs are business-savvy, but technologically illiterate.
"Hence, the knowledge sharing approach between CEOs and vendors
is vital. Vendors have to be less technical," says Alliance
Bank's See. "Perhaps, an Internet security for dummies book
should be made available," he smiles.
Value in security investments
Major security threats facing local companies, according to
Beh, are viruses, threats from Internet access points, and
threats from internal information accessed and taken out from
organisations. "Viruses are harder to control. Companies must
be diligent enough to update anti-virus definition patterns,
and educate staff not to simply open any applications," she
says.
To set up a proper security architecture, the common challenge
among businesses seems to be getting the return on investment
on the thousands or million of ringgit poured into security
solutions.
Getting the budget approved is perhaps the greatest hurdle
for many IS managers because many CEOs still do not see security
as an essential business investment to safeguard their interests.
Sharing his own experience, See admits that his company previously
had no idea what security was all about. "The management thought
everything was taken care of once we had our IT infrastructure
up."
Meanwhile, IDC's Chin says it is difficult to measure return
on investment for security solutions because most people would
only look at the initial investments, not the charges for
maintenance and support. But all these have to be taken into
profit and loss considerations, she explains.
Moreover, security investment is usually divided into hardware,
software, and services, she adds. Globally, security services
which include consulting and implementation services account
for almost 50 per cent of total investment, while hardware
is still the smallest portion.
In Asia, however, investment in security services is lower
at about 30 per cent, Chin points out. This is due to many
Asian companies expecting implementation cost to be part of
the solutions purchased.
Businesses need to fully understand what their own requirements
are. It is not advisable to get full-blown solutions which
may even pose bigger risks if not properly assessed.
"Companies must spend time conducting research and evaluating
the various products in the market before making any firm
purchasing decision," Chin advises. For Dang, it took the
Nimda virus attack to halt operations for a month in Allianz
to finally get his management to speed up the budget approval
for new security solutions. Nevertheless, he still finds it
challenging to get the management to understand IT security.
A sound policy
Having a solid security infrastructure must also go hand-in-hand
with a solid security policy that governs and monitors activities
within and outside an organisation.
"There is no point if you throw in the best security technology
but without a solid policy, things will still break," says
See. A good security policy with compliance checks and audits
calls for all employees to be aware what they are allowed
or not allowed to do to safeguard their organisation, says
Beh. Limited information access to authorised personnel is
one of the important elements in the policy, she adds.
But dealing with human control is always a challenge for
many organisation. Sometimes, employees while doing their
own things may expose the weakest link of the organisation
to risks.
No matter what, there is no guarantee that security breaches
would not happen although a solid policy and infrastructure
have been set up. But at least with a good infrastructure,
there is a controlled risk environment where users can continuously
maintain, Beh says.
Some multinational companies, according to her, would insist
that their business partners have proper security measures
in place before even connecting to their networks.
"If you want to compete in the global market, you have got
to make sure your security infrastructure and policies are
in line with industry standards, like the global ISO 17799
security practices," Beh says.
While large organisations would normally have security policies
in place, most small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and
Government agencies do not, she continues.
In fact, many SMEs do not even have a proper IT system, lest
a security policies, Beh says. "How do you expect them to
be aware of the importance of maintenance and patches? The
scariest part is what they do not know will hurt them most,"
she remarks.
As such, Beh suggests that SME associations and various agencies
like Small and Medium Industries Development Corporation (Smidec)
should come forward to educate their members about security.
"Prioritise and highlight areas of importance so that SMEs
have a basic understanding of what must be involved".
<< Back to
SecureTangent Press Releases
|